![]() A Wall Street Journaleditorial on November 4 spun its view of what is at issue for the Democratic Party: “Voters warn Democrats to walk away from the Sanders-Pelosi agenda.” The Democrats’ own leadership quickly agreed with this take, playing the blame game against the Progressive Caucus for insisting on economic reforms that opinion polls have reported are precisely what voters say they want.īut these are not the policies that the party’s major donors want. History has been rewritten daily this week almost immediately as it occurs. His latest book is “and forgive them their debts”: Lending, Foreclosure and Redemption from Bronze Age Finance to the Jubilee Year Having shelter and food are far more important than identity, yet the Democrats haven’t retreated from “Let them eat wokeness” mode.īy Michael Hudson, a research professor of Economics at University of Missouri, Kansas City, and a research associate at the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Apparently they never heard of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. ![]() It’s hard to attribute voter rejection of a Clinton hack to progressives, but the Democratic Party is skilled above all at denial.Īnd the irony is that in 2016, the Democrats were braying that the future was theirs, that one-time minority groups becoming the majority was sure to consign the Republicans to a permanent diminished state. Voters are wising up on the Democratic Party failing to deliver on economic promises that they intended never to honor, and trying to distract from that with “Orange Man Still Bad!” and identity politics. ![]() ![]() ![]() One of the reasons for the implosion, according to Wikipedia, is “The party failed to develop an effective platform on which to campaign.” Some readers have taken to comparing the Democratic Party to the Whigs, which collapsed in the mid 1850s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |